No Parking! – Final Nail in the Coffin! 

Mayor Adams’ City of Yes
Demands for No Parking Requirements

Does anyone recall Mayor Eric Adams making the bold statements that outside agitators were influencing the Columbia’s protests, later finding out that 99% of people arrested were in fact Columbia students?

Now under Mayor Adams COY Text Amendments there are outside agitators being directed to come to Community Boards all over NYC to push for the City of Yes’ No Parking requirements.

However, not only are these (possibly paid) agitators coming, but they are carrying with them with misinformation, which we will address.

Cars vs. Apartments

The media, politicians and the Department of City Planning, continues to stress that two parking spaces can be the size of one small studio. While this may be true depending upon the size of the studio, the impression that less parking spaces will increase the number of apartments is not true. This is because it fails to tell you the whole truth, which is….

A developer cannot substitute parking spaces for apartments. Parking requirements cost developers more money and thus their elimination will just add to their profit margin and not an increase in apartments within their building.

Explanation:

*Floor Area Ratio “FAR” is the formula that allows a developer to determine how many apartments he can build. A developer can not build more than the FAR is allowed, which is based upon the type of zoning the lot is located on.

For example, a developer determines, based upon his FAR, that he can build a maximum of 100 apartments, and if he chooses to build the maximum he must build 40 parking spaces. If he no longer has to build the parking spaces, he can still only  build those 100 apartments!

*FAR is the livable portions of a building which doesn’t include parking spaces that are located in non-livable spaces, such as below ground level, or outside of a building.

Luxury Housing Brings Additional Cars … Developers Currently Only Provide
10% to 25% Parking

According to the City, for every one luxury apartment, two cars come with it. Thus, the current regulations which require from 20%- 50% (depending upon the zoning) parking spaces for the amount of apartments, in fact doesn’t account for over 75%-90% of the cars that are already coming into the community.

For Example:

If 100 luxury apartments are planned, 200 cars would be anticipated. The developer may have to provide from 20 to 50 parking spaces for those 200 cars, leaving from 150 to 170 cars coming into the community and the developer not providing parking for them.

This is why any community that has luxury developments or higher income residents come into the community has seen a serious increase in the amount of cars in the community and the reduction of free parking spaces on the streets.

Please Note:

Developers don’t provide any parking for the “Affordable Categories”, despite a lot of these categories being luxury housing.

For example, the “Work Force” option under Mandatory Inclusionary Housing “MIH,”, so called affordable, is 130% AMI, ($141,310 to $298,870).

The City Has Already Reduced Free Parking

During the past decade New Yorkers have already seen a drastic reduction in parking spaces due to the various private/public partnership with special interests groups and businesses.

Ride Shares – Giving two parking spaces for $450 a year to private car businesses. (It has been reported that the slashing of tires has returned some of these spaces back to the public)

Open Streets– Taking away parking via “closed streets”, pushed by Transportation Alternatives, who is funded by private corporation such as Lyft.

*Bike Lanes – Removing parking to be replaced with Bike Lanes, again supported by Transportation Alternatives.

Restaurant Sheds– Empty restaurant sheds all over the city, collecting dirt, rodents and garbage, supported by large business bids.

City Bikes – Large swaths of parking spaces have been removed to accommodate City Bikes. However, the constant full bike stations in some communities clearly show that people are not biking! (Let’s not forget that
.08% of the population are bikers or 99.02% are not!)

*Despite all of the talk about wanting to remove cars off of the streets for the health of the public (global warming) there is currently a plan to kill off dozens of trees to put a bike lane just a few feet away from Prospect Parks’ bike line. (For another post)

Moving From Free to Private Parking

If developers are allowed to put up thousands of apartments and not provide any parking for them, this will not only drastically reduce available parking on the streets, but will incentivize parking to move away from free to private parking, like in low to mid-town Manhattan.

Residents can expect, more of their private street parking turned into municipal parking (i.e. meters), especially streets that may border heavy commercial zones; create paid private parking in those new buildings and increase parking fines, meters costs etc..

 

 

Community Boards Beware!
Outside Agitators Are Coming

Image below: Email from “Open Plans”, (a non-profit funded by the real estate industry), directing agitators to come to a Community Board in Brooklyn.

It has been discovered that emails and letters are being sent to agitators who don’t live in the community directing them to come to the community board’s land use committees and demand that City of Yes Housing Amendments be supported.

Not only are these outside agitators directed to come to the *community boards, but they are given talking points (which of course they will simply repeat over and over again without any clear understanding of what they are talking about). They are also given sample letters to write to the Community Boards “CBs” as a template along with the CB’s email address.

*Residents found a letter from a paid organizer, from Open Plans, (real estate funded non-profit pro-development group) directing their “members” to come to Brooklyn Community Board 9’s Land use Committee on Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7pm and demand that CB9 support the City of Yes, mandate to eliminate parking requirements. (See image above).

 

The True Goal of Mayor Adams’ COY… Increase Profits for Developers And
Privatization of  Essential Services

Free parking on our streets is an essential service that the city provides to its residents.  However residents all around the City, are noticing how that service is being curtailed and in some cases eliminated all together (removal of parking spaces).

The serious reduction in public free parking coupled with an increase in  housing production being planned under the COY Housing Text Amendments, parking spaces will solely be controlled by private interests. The mandate for developers to provide parking will be the nail in the coffin.

Free parking will be a dream of the past as private corporations determine who can get parking and for how much. In fact, one could almost foresee a time when only the very rich would be able to own or ride in a private vehicle, leaving the masses to depend upon business corporations to provide transportation to them.

*It has been estimated that if the City of Yes gets it 20% increase in heights, it will create over a million apartments at a time when the city is losing over a 100,000 people a year. 

As a recap, here’s a quick MTOPP video on why removing parking mandates will not increase housing supply, just real estate profits!

 

 


0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *